A War on Trust


hands people friends communication
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

In the midst of a global pandemic and sweeping stay at home orders,  US gun sales and licensing are through the roof.  God bless America.

In a country where there are already more guns than people, this is a sign of something extremely disturbing. It is a sign of sickness that over time has been far more lethal than the coronavirus will ever be and it is rooted in something that has plagued this country for far too long: mistrust.

Before we get back to work, we need to actually get back to trust.  Within my lifetime, I have witnessed a sharp erosion in basic systems of trust in the United States. One could argue that it is an erosion that began with the election and assassination of John F. Kennedy, or the culmination and broken promises of the US Government from the Civil Rights Movement but the tragedies and dysfunctions of our political and social systems are not actually the symptoms of the erosion, but rather the mechanisms that amplify and carry the erosion.  The other key mechanism has been mass media.  What we are currently living in is a perfect storm where politics, media and tribalism are driving total suspicion of one another.

A lack of trust is everywhere.  The most damning parts of the 2020 impeachment trial came directly out of mistrust for the motivations of the President based on his deeply suspect actions.  Resistance to that same impeachment came from mistrust of one political party for another because of an election year and a previous administration; Black Lives Matter came out of mistrust of police and law enforcement based on their repeatedly targeting people of color with lethal response; #MeToo came out of mistrust for men who have too often been given a cultural pass to abuse women. Even the public resurgence of Neo-Nazis and white supremacists came from a racist mistrust for a system that elected a black man as President.  And there is much, much more…

“…we cannot win a war against a disease of the body until we win the war on the disease of the heart.”

But most tragic of all, today thousands of American lives have been lost to the coronavirus because our governmental leadership didn’t trust (or didn’t want to be seen as trusting) the information being conveyed to them by qualified medical professionals and the international community. Now, as the system once again fails vulnerable populations with the numbers of black and brown Americans dying in significantly higher proportions than their white counterparts, yet another stage is being set for deeper mistrust.

Some say we are fighting a war against the coronavirus, but before this battlefront emerged, we were deep in the trenches of a war on trust.  The problem is that we cannot win a war against a disease of the body until we win the war on the disease of the heart.  Putting people back to work in a vulnerable environment in low wage precarious employment is not the solution.  Propping up multi-billion-dollar corporations that thrive on the abuse of employees and the rape of the environment is not the solution. While people are literally dying by the thousands, our government is focused on “winning” the economy.  What about winning people’s hard earned trust? What about saving lives?  The current strategy is a shocking abdication of public duty even if it is no surprise.

Coming out of the 9/11 attacks we learned a new phrase, “War on Terror.”  Sadly, the war on terror has translated into a commonplace paranoid world view that wants to see terror and war everywhere.  And so we have been told to look at coronavirus as a war.  We are told to receive the implosion of the global markets as a “war on the economy.”  We are told that people are “fighters” and that they can “win” against the disease.  If we are going to claim a place in the world that moves toward peace, that cultivates wholeness in humanity and that seeks justice of any kind, we must shift our focus from this flailing warlike stance and commit 100% of ourselves to reclaiming our humanity and first win the “war” on trust.

And yes, in order to win a war on trust, we will first have to put down the guns and stop thinking of it as a war in the first place.

ALD

The Smartest Thing I Ever Heard

Yesterday, I heard Dr. Sanjay Gupta from CNN say something that everyone needs to hear in the coronavirus response here in the US.  Encouraging people to do more about social distancing and self-isolating as precautionary measures he said:

“Act as if you might be carrying the virus.” 

Sanjay Gupta
Dr. Sanjay Gupta

When I heard these words, they struck a chord in me.  I remember very clearly in the late 80’s when a medical advocate for HIV/AIDS said the smartest thing I ever heard: “Act as if you and everyone else has HIV”.  The rationale was that one would own responsibility for transmitting the virus to others more than if one was simply trying to dodge a bullet.  This became a mantra for me.  Not only did it make safer sex easy and fun, it lowered my anxiety because it put me in control of my choices. This same medical professional helped me understand that even without being HIV+, if I was sick in other ways, that I could be endangering someone with a compromised immune system. This posture gave me skin in the game and helped me make better more informed choices.

The other thing it did was it helped me see the world through the lens of ownership.  Through the lens of ownership, it was impossible to see partners with HIV as something to avoid.  I recognized that we were first and foremost human beings and that we were not defined by the viruses we carry.  We all have agency and more importantly, we all hold responsibility for public health.

This is the reason that I believe Dr. Gupta’s words are crucial, particularly in the United States.  Our country was founded on marginalization and otherization.  “Haves and have nots” are built into our government, our economy, our religion and most definitely into our healthcare.  As we move forward with strategies to face the reality of what this virus may do in our society, we also must be prudent not to fall into this most American of traps.  How are people without access to healthcare getting tested and cared for?  What about the unhoused?  What about people who are undocumented?  The Trump administration is already working to end asylum based on the coronavirus, an utterly heartless Steven Miller motivated move.

I’m not actually sure I agree with the language [of social distancing] ….  But I agree and will comply with the strategy, particularly when I think of it as an act of mutual generosity.

And this is not just about the most vulnerable.  Once we solve the inexcusable failing of providing easy and free access to tests, what about people who just don’t believe or don’t want to believe it will be them? What about the suburban parent who is afraid to get tested for coronavirus because of what that will mean for their family?  What about the workaholic spouse under financial pressure to keep his family fed through this who refuses to get tested and self-isolate because he’s been taught that he needs to “man up” and “tough it out”?  What about the stalwart elder who insists, “I know my body, it’s just a cold…it can’t be coronavirus”?  These are the same kinds of denials I heard people offer in the early 90’s when HIV testing was a mark of shame in the gay community.  Through denial and a lack of access to testing, HIV has killed more people than was ever necessary.

The idea of “social distancing” is very troubling and difficult for some.  I’m not actually sure I agree with the language myself.  But I agree and will comply with the strategy, particularly when I think of it as an act of mutual generosity.  While having knowledge and a degree of ownership empowers me to be closer to people with HIV, similarly having knowledge and ownership can enable us to be physically separated with coronavirus.  In both instances, I believe knowledge, ownership and responsibility are sacred acts of love.

Let me be absolutely clear, coronavirus is not in any way at all HIV.  I am not attempting to equate the two and my decades long experience with and losses from the latter would never let me write something like this casually.  We are still afraid of frank talk about sex and intimacy and we still haven’t figured out how to navigate what it means to live in an HIV+ world, although things have definitely gotten better. We have a long, long way to go to equity with HIV/AIDS.  On the other hand, we are just learning how to live in a world with coronavirus. In this emergent time, what we must be most wary of is how our reaction to illness of any kind tends to be very similar and some of our worst impulses become activated. We must not make mistakes that are even vaguely similar to those we made/ make with HIV that are driven by fear and misinformation class snobbery, economic opportunism and shame.

Act as if you might be carrying the virus.  We all must take responsibility, even if our leadership does not.

-ALD