…and the wrong game…

battle black blur board game
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Donald Trump is not a successful business man.  Donald Trump is a successful brand.  I suspect this is why he refers to himself in the third person.  I also suspect this is why the Republican party has fallen in lockstep behind him.

The Democratic Party will not win in 2020 if it continues to navigate the Trump presidency as it is.  I’m sure Tom Perez is a smart guy, but I am positive that the party is basically fighting the wrong fight.  Issues will never win over ideology.  Every great conflict in the United States has seen ideology rule victorious…even if that victory has been qualified and compromised: The American Revolution (liberty); The Civil War (union/slavery); WWII (anti-fascism) Civil Rights (black equality).  This is also evident where the non-progressive forces have won and continue to resist: Jim Crow & lynching (white supremacy); women’s rights (male domination); Native and Indigenous displacement (manifest destiny and white entitlement), etc.

The Trump administration and by extension the Republican party and by further extension conservative politics has become entirely about ideology.  I am not a Republican (technically, I’m an Independent) so I will not presume to understand the inner workings of the conservative Republican agenda.  But I have observed the following:

  • The current conservative Republican platform is based on the following assumptions:
    • Capitalism is the best system for resource distribution
    • Religion is important
    • Cultural identity is secondary to being “American”

These assumptions become counter narratives that allow conservatives leverage basic principles of progressive politics as weapons against themselves:

  • The liberal agenda uses race and gender as both punishments and excuses
  • Progressive politics is based on victimhood
  • Diversity is always divided in its allegiances

As I watch progressives play into the hands of conservatives more and more every day, one thing is clear: Conservatives, via the Republican party are invested in fundamentally changing the meaning of American life by enshrining the assumptions I laid out above in law.  When Jenna Ellis, a Trump legal advisor defines ‘conservative’ as being to “conserve” the rule of law, it is abundantly clear that we are no longer in Kansas…if we were ever there at all.

Progressives need to stop worrying about beating Donald Trump.  That is the quick fix.  We must play the long game.  The real challenge will come down the line when someone like Richard B. Spencer (the neo-Nazi not the Secretary of the Navy) de-stinks himself enough to run for office and has enough of a following to win.  He’s only 41.  It is the next generation of hate mongers that are the real danger here because they are not just invested in creating the ideology, they already breathe it.

In order to succeed, progressives need to cultivate an ideological agenda that will counter the goals that underlie current conservative politics which I believe are:

  • Protecting white, male, able-bodied privilege
  • Erasing community accountability
  • Silencing the conversation on race
  • Promoting nationalism and local-ism at all costs

It is essential for progressives to recognize the ideological battle and be willing to name it.  Currently, the only Democratic candidate willing to do this has been Marianne Williamson.  She is right, we are fighting the wrong battle with “plans” and “data” and even with “math”; and Bloomberg and Patrick will just gum up the works.  Someone needs to step outside of the pack and present a dynamic ideological framework that people can get behind.  If they don’t, we and our democratic and moral systems will be left with something far worse than just four more years of Trump…we will be left with his signature legacy: bankruptcy.

– ALD

Looking for Black Votes

Deval_Patrick_official_photo
Governor Deval Patrick, 71st Governor of Massachusetts – Official Photograph

The 2020 presidential candidates are all clamoring for the black vote.  Even though Trump basically won the election with virtually no black support (Clinton had 88% of the black vote to Trump’s 8%[1]) Trump recognizes that his below 50% presidency means that he has no insurance policy…particularly with the government actively working against foreign interference, Julian Assange behind bars, Roger Ailes dead and Mark Zuckerberg turning into the anti-Christ.  Trump recently launched his initiative to court black voters in Atlanta where he rolled out his 2020 freakshow and freak-self asking the crowd “What do you prefer…‘Blacks for Trump’ or ‘African-Americans for Trump?’ ”[2]

This is the problem for all of the candidates courting the black vote…not just Trump but the “top tier” Democratic candidates as well.  None of them seems to have any kind of depth of knowledge or experience actually knowing any black people.

I have regularly put the challenge to my congregation “who do you know?”  Another way to put it is, what does your world look like?  My challenge to them and to the candidates is to actually take a close look at their world.  If everyone in your world looks and sounds just like you or is some variation on the same, you are going to have a devilish time connecting on an authentic level with people outside of that bubble.  It is not impossible to connect, but short of getting to know every single person everywhere it takes intention and a little bit of magic; it is the gift of the true politician.  Obama had it as did George W. Bush for all of his failings.  It is a specific blend of authentic interest in people and a really clear understanding of your own world.

This ability to navigate and swim among strangers is something that I had to learn to be successful as a Cruise Director.  As I was transitioning into ministry, I recognized a need for this kind of awareness for religious professionals and communities that were trying and failing to make “multi-cultural” connections.  I developed a series of workshops that ask people to take a personal inventory of their world.  In the workshops I invite an honest conversation about how that world shapes their worldview. But the most important piece is asking participants at the end to commit to putting this self-knowledge into practice.  I ask people to let go of a sense of perfection and show up as their real selves in relationship to people who may present as “strangers.” I ask them, as I ask of myself, to show up vulnerable, humble and true.  This has been an extremely powerful tool in “anti-racism” work within predominantly white settings even though I didn’t develop it just for white audiences.

Although I don’t feel Bloomberg or Patrick should run, it is clear that they recognize the absolute weakness of social skill in the field.  Not weak in terms of policy ideas or knowledge or experience, but weak as real people.

Black voters, like anyone else, can smell a fake and if the way I feel is any example, black voters are also extremely tired of only being courted or asked for input or invited to the party when we are providing the entertainment or bringing the cake.  Scant few of the candidates has a longstanding relationship with black communities and if they do, its been fraught and has not translated into a broader appeal.  I ask those candidates as well, “who do you know?”  How do you show up authentically in Iowa or Missouri or Kansas if you’ve never been engaged with these places and people or if you aren’t willing to show up with a humble and authentic desire for relationship? What does Kamala Harris talk to the immigrant in the meatpacking plant in Minnesota about that isn’t her campaign?  What does Pete Buttigieg say to the black Vietnam veteran in Louisiana that isn’t about his own service?  What does Elizabeth Warren say to the gay minister in Massachusetts that isn’t a soundbyte?

As I look at the field of Democratic candidates and even the field of Republicans (including the gangster-in-chief) I’m not just disappointed, I’m angry that our politics have come to this.  Although I don’t feel Bloomberg or Patrick should run, it is clear that they recognize the absolute weakness of social skill in the field.  Not weak in terms of policy ideas or knowledge or experience, but weak as real people.  This is probably why Joe Biden has hung on this long.  People I know who have known him unanimously declare him to be hopelessly likeable.  He shouldn’t be president now, but he’s a notoriously good guy.  He’s made a career out of it.

Houston, we have a problem…not just because there’s only one candidate that can locate Houston on a map (thank you Julian Castro) but because politics has become calculus.  Andrew Yang is correct to be wearing a “Math” button, but sadly its not the kind of math he means.  The math that is overwhelming our entire political landscape is the math of demographics and economics mixed with the math of donors and political allies.  It is a political system that tragically has always seen black bodies in particular through math and has only once gotten to know, appreciate and fully see us beyond a “market value.”

[1] https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/trump_vs_clinton_among_african_americans-6142.html

[2] https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/donald-trump-makes-an-awkward-pitch-to-black-voters-in-atlanta